http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/latestnews/Brown-backs-off-from-October.5412172.jp
“GORDON Brown yesterday signalled the general election was unlikely to be held until next year”
(EDITOR: No surprise there, then.)
“Britain faces “riots on the streets” if Gordon Brown’s “dishonesty” over public spending enables him to win the next election, David Cameron said”
(EDITOR: I rather fear he might be right)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1196427/Public-spending-lies-party-beneath-contempt.html
“With breathtaking contempt for democracy, Lord Mandelson casually lets slip in a radio interview that the Government will be postponing its public spending review until after the election. Are there no depths to which Labour won't sink?”
(EDITOR: I have a horrible feeling we wont have long to wait to find out...)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6605915.ece
“Brown takes cash from schools, roads and health to pay for 30,000 homes”
(EDITOR: But remember, folks! Labour are not the party of cuts!)
“Gordon Brown's bid to save his beleaguered premiership and stay in power beyond 2010 was rubbished by opposition parties as an uncosted ragbag of "rehashed initiatives".”
(EDITOR: Sounds a reasonable assessment!)
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6605850.ece
“Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job or training”
(EDITOR: If the Tories had suggested this, just imagine the Brownite shrieks!)
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2009/06/30/my-manifesto-115875-21482528/
“My Manifesto: Brown's £1bn to build homes and jobs for young: Gordon Brown unveiled his plan to rebuild the country yesterday by getting youngsters into work and constructing thousands of homes”
(EDITOR: As Brown seems to have problems abiding by the last Labour Manifesto, why should he be trusted with this one?)
“Ministers have secretly placed the £20 billion replacement for Britain's Trident nuclear deterrent under review in a move which could see it dramatically scaled down”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jun/28/defence-projects-axed-save-money
“Defence projects worth billions of pounds, such as replacing the Trident nuclear deterrent, could have to be axed to help fill a "black hole" in the defence budget, senior military and political figures will warn tomorrow. Overstretch of the armed forces must be ended, according to a report whose authors include the former Nato secretary general, Lord Robertson, ex-Marine Lord Ashdown and former chief of the defence staff Lord Guthrie”
(EDITOR: Defence still seems impossible for Labour to get right, does it? Why is it that Socialists in other countries have no problem with spending money on defence but that the British Labour Party seems to think it immoral to pay our soldiers and service personnel a decent wage or to house them and their families in decent accommodation?)
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/2009/06/30/gordon-s-1bn-challenged-91466-24019694/
“GORDON BROWN tried to stake the ground for the next election yesterday with a £1bn spending programme he hopes will revive his flagging political fortunes. The Government’s programme for the months leading up to the election includes extra training opportunities for young people, a series of England-only public service reforms and the removal of the final hereditary peers from the House of Lords. But the announcement, effectively a re-launch of Mr Brown’s premiership, was overshadowed by the intervention of Lord Mandelson, who said there would not be a Spending Review – which allocates cash to each Whitehall department – before the election.”
(EDITOR: So why DID Mandelson decide to intervene in such a fashion? In effect, slapping Gordon Brown, down?)
“Commons will be 'emasculated' by expenses proposals, says Philip Mawer: The House of Commons risks being "emasculated" by the Government's proposed clean-up following the expenses scandal, the former parliamentary standards watchdog has warned”
(EDITOR: That's probably the intended result, rather than an accidental by-product)
“Eight senior Tories decide they can get by without MPs' expenses”
“Andrew Grice: It's your choice: Dodgy Gordon or Honest David”
And on that note, it's time to close this update. Though it#s only 7.25, so Gord knows what the rest of the day will bring. Only, perhaps Gord doesn't know? After all, Lord M's intervention must have irritated him. Unless Lrd M. is vainly attempting to reign Gord in? Or is he playing a longer game? If so, what? Who does Lord M. want in power? Himself or someone else? Interesting times ahead, I feel.